Einstien was a nutter
its no wonder nothing works.
and where does this leave rockin ron and his nasa sperm whale jizz bearings? full of shit like every other scientist
Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
Andy wrote:Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
Why what's not working?

Plank wrote:Andy wrote:Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
Why what's not working?
Me.
ChrisK wrote:Even when i was a kid I used to think 'how can they be sure nothing goes faster than light?'
Scientists can be as arrogant and blind as the religous nutters they condem.

vato kat wrote:The barman says 'We don't serve faster-than-light particles in here'. A neutrino walks into a bar.
vato kat wrote:The barman says 'We don't serve faster-than-light particles in here'. A neutrino walks into a bar.
Rob G wrote:vato kat wrote:The barman says 'We don't serve faster-than-light particles in here'. A neutrino walks into a bar.
I'm nicking that.
Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
and where does this leave rockin ron and his nasa sperm whale jizz bearings? full of shit like every other scientist
Andy wrote:Plank wrote:Andy wrote:Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
Why what's not working?
Me.
have you tried switching yourself off and then on again?
clyde wrote:100 years ago nothing could go faster than sound
vato kat wrote:The barman says 'We don't serve faster-than-light particles in here'. A neutrino walks into a bar.
Andy wrote:You are all aware this hasn't been replicated else where yet and may just be a fuck up
why do you say that einstein was a nutter, anyway?
Plank wrote:why do you say that einstein was a nutter, anyway?
His hair.
Mobile Dogwash wrote:Plank wrote:why do you say that einstein was a nutter, anyway?
His hair.
lol ok
do all the mentally ill folks you know have curly white hair then?
Bigger Geek
Posts: 1820
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: cornish expat in s.yorkshire and now kent
Mobile Dogwash wrote:Plank wrote:why do you say that einstein was a nutter, anyway?
His hair.
lol ok
do all the mentally ill folks you know have curly white hair then?

Carl Arnfield wrote:^^^^ are you related to him then?
clyde wrote:100 years ago nothing could go faster than sound
Andy wrote:You are all aware this hasn't been replicated else where yet and may just be a fuck up
monkeyfinger wrote:It appears that Mr Einstein may be owed an apology from MAS for calling him a nutter - it seems there may be some "faulty wiring" in the Gran Sasso Lab....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17139635
Plank wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
its no wonder nothing works.![]()
![]()
![]()
and where does this leave rockin ron and his nasa sperm whale jizz bearings? full of shit like every other scientist
durkin wrote:Look's like another late reply from me! I think the whole accelerated neutrino thing is bullshite when you use the relativity theory. I'm not that good at physics, or philosophy! But just because a neutrino arrives, at it's measuring point, quicker than a photon, in a positron accelerator; that doesn't in my eyes mean that it is going faster than time. The big thing that seems to be overlooked is that the theories of relativity only allow time to be measured by the speed of light. Obviously Einstein usurped Euclidian physics, but still the fundamental flaw lies in the belief that time itself relies on the speed of light, because I suppose nothing was ever considered faster! So just because a neutrino arrives at point B at 23.07, and the photon arrives at 23.09, having travelled a certain distance at the speed of light, surely the 'time' will still be the same for both of them, except one arrived a bit later. If we were each a neutrino or a photon, travelling in separate spaceships, from point A to B and one arrived before the other, surely it would just that mean one arrived before the other. I would not be younger if I arrived first, than the photon who arrived after me; even by a few minutes: I would have just got there first. Well that's just my uneducated opinion, based on pure reason!
Ooooh Me brain hurts
As far as bearing go, I bought some ACER SK8 bearings on the internet. Is it possible, that if you put too much force on your nose the board stops, just due to the bearings not coping with the force. I bailed loads of times today, with a lot of force going through my nose end, with my body quite forward as well, and I know I was trying some new stuff, but I did not expect that response from my board. It was like having sudden breaks put on, causing me to fly forward off the board! If anyone can be arsed, have you any suggestions as to why this might be happening? I don't want to blame equipment or set-up because it probably is technique.
Users browsing this forum: Rob G and 1 guest